Not implying any obligation whatsoever or whatnot here, but the kind of approach you're taking with STAR is a pretty good match for how we're doing things in DASL. We have a very lightweight approach to specs, and if it's of interest to you we'd love to see if it makes sense to include STAR. It'd also be great to have you present it to at a CID Congress if you're up for it!
STreaming ARchives: stricter, verifiable, deterministic, highly compressible alternatives to CAR files for atproto repositories.
atproto
car
DASLify? #1
open
opened by
robin.berjon.com
robin.berjon.com
(author)
Argh, sorry, I thought I had email notifications on but didn't :(
I think it's worth having the conversation about it in the DASL community. The only thing we're absolutists about is making things work. We already have specs that assume AT. Would you be up for talking about it at a CID Congress? It's a very friendly and informal monthly. Worst-case scenario it'll be a good conversation, but I can see people being interested in landing this.
[deleted by author]
robin.berjon.com
(author)
Yeah there's no rush, that would be great!