+354

papers/arxiv-open-schools/open-schools.tex

reviewed

··· 1 1 + % !TEX program = xelatex 2 2 + \documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{article} 3 3 + 4 4 + \usepackage{fontspec} 5 5 + \usepackage{unicode-math} 6 6 + \setmainfont{Latin Modern Roman} 7 7 + \setsansfont{Latin Modern Sans} 8 8 + \setmonofont{Latin Modern Mono}[Scale=0.88] 9 9 + 10 10 + \usepackage{graphicx} 11 11 + \graphicspath{{figures/}{../arxiv-ac/figures/}} 12 12 + \usepackage{booktabs} 13 13 + \usepackage{tabularx} 14 14 + \usepackage{ragged2e} 15 15 + \usepackage{microtype} 16 16 + \usepackage{natbib} 17 17 + \usepackage{multicol} 18 18 + 19 19 + \usepackage[ 20 20 + top=2.2cm, bottom=2.5cm, left=2.0cm, right=2.0cm 21 21 + ]{geometry} 22 22 + 23 23 + \makeatletter 24 24 + \def\input@path{{../}} 25 25 + \makeatother 26 26 + \usepackage{ac-paper-layout} 27 27 + 28 28 + \newcommand{\acos}{\textsc{AC Native OS}} 29 29 + 30 30 + \hypersetup{ 31 31 + pdftitle={Get Closed Source Out of Schools: Every Chromebook Is a Gateway Denied}, 32 32 + } 33 33 + 34 34 + \begin{document} 35 35 + 36 36 + \thispagestyle{empty} 37 37 + \vspace*{\fill} 38 38 + \begin{center} 39 39 + \includegraphics[height=8em]{pals}\par\vspace{0.3em} 40 40 + {\acbold\fontsize{18pt}{22pt}\selectfont\color{acdark} Get Closed Source Out of Schools}\par 41 41 + \vspace{0.3em} 42 42 + {\fontsize{10pt}{12pt}\selectfont\color{acpink} Every Chromebook Is a Gateway Denied}\par 43 43 + \vspace{0.8em} 44 44 + {\normalsize\color{cyan!70!blue}\textbf{@jeffrey}}\par 45 45 + {\small\color{acgray} Aesthetic.Computer}\par 46 46 + {\small\color{acgray} ORCID: \href{https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4460-4913}{0009-0007-4460-4913}}\par 47 47 + \vspace{0.8em} 48 48 + \rule{0.6\textwidth}{1pt}\par 49 49 + \vspace{0.4em} 50 50 + {\small\color{acpink!40}\textit{working draft --- not for citation}}\par 51 51 + \vspace{0.3em} 52 52 + {\footnotesize\color{acgray} March 2026}\par 53 53 + \end{center} 54 54 + \vspace*{\fill} 55 55 + \clearpage 56 56 + 57 57 + \begin{multicols}{2} 58 58 + 59 59 + % ============================================================ 60 60 + % ABSTRACT 61 61 + % ============================================================ 62 62 + 63 63 + \begin{abstract} 64 64 + \noindent 65 65 + There are over 50 million Chromebooks in American schools. Each one is a capable computer running a locked-down, closed-source operating system that funnels every student interaction through Google's surveillance infrastructure. The student cannot see how the machine works. The student cannot modify the machine. The student cannot own the machine in any meaningful sense. In the age of large language models---when ``everyone is a programmer'' is no longer a slogan but a material reality---this is an act of educational malpractice. This paper argues that every student deserves a free and open operating system stack: one where the Chromebook becomes a gateway to the student's own path through logic, creativity, the internet, community, and the computational landscape as a whole. We describe the technical, pedagogical, and political case for replacing closed-source school computing infrastructure with open alternatives, and present \acos{}~\citep{scudder2026acos} as one concrete implementation of this vision. 66 66 + \end{abstract} 67 67 + 68 68 + % ============================================================ 69 69 + % 1. THE CHROMEBOOK PROBLEM 70 70 + % ============================================================ 71 71 + 72 72 + \section{The Chromebook Problem} 73 73 + 74 74 + In 2012, Google began aggressively marketing Chromebooks to American school districts. The pitch was simple: cheap hardware, zero IT overhead, everything in the cloud. By 2026, Chromebooks account for roughly 60\% of devices shipped to U.S. K--12 schools~\citep{google2024chromeos}. An entire generation of American students is being educated on machines they cannot understand, cannot modify, and do not own---even when the school paid for them. 75 75 + 76 76 + ChromeOS is proprietary software. Its source is not available for inspection. The browser is the entire interface. Every document lives in Google Drive. Every search goes through Google. Every interaction is logged, analyzed, and used to build behavioral profiles that follow the student into adulthood~\citep{zuboff2019surveillance}. 77 77 + 78 78 + This is not a privacy concern at the margins. This is the \emph{architecture} of how American children learn to use computers. The medium is the message~\citep{mcluhan1964understanding}: the Chromebook teaches that a computer is a device for consuming cloud services owned by a corporation. It teaches that your work lives on someone else's server. It teaches that the machine is not yours to understand. 79 79 + 80 80 + \subsection{What the Student Cannot Do} 81 81 + 82 82 + On a school Chromebook, a student cannot: 83 83 + 84 84 + \begin{itemize} 85 85 + \item Install a programming language runtime 86 86 + \item Run a local web server 87 87 + \item Compile code 88 88 + \item Inspect the operating system source 89 89 + \item Modify the boot sequence 90 90 + \item Connect to hardware peripherals for physical computing 91 91 + \item Use the machine offline for serious work 92 92 + \item Keep their data on the device without cloud sync 93 93 + \item Choose their own software 94 94 + \item Understand what the machine is doing with their attention 95 95 + \end{itemize} 96 96 + 97 97 + Every one of these restrictions is a door closed. Every closed door is a path the student will never discover. The Chromebook is not a gateway---it is a \emph{gate}. 98 98 + 99 99 + \subsection{The Cloud as Landlord} 100 100 + 101 101 + When a student's work lives in Google Drive, they are tenants, not owners. Google can change the terms of service. Google can discontinue products. Google can revoke access. The student graduates and loses their school Google account---and with it, every document, every project, every creative artifact they produced during their education. 102 102 + 103 103 + This is not hypothetical. It happens every year. Students lose access to years of work because the institution that purchased their cloud account decommissions it. The architecture \emph{guarantees} this outcome: the student never had their files. They had permission to access files on Google's servers, and that permission was revoked. 104 104 + 105 105 + Freire called this the ``banking model'' of education~\citep{freire1970pedagogy}: knowledge deposited into students by authorities. The Chromebook literalizes the metaphor. The student's work is deposited into a bank they do not control, cannot audit, and will eventually be locked out of. 106 106 + 107 107 + % ============================================================ 108 108 + % 2. THE LLM INFLECTION 109 109 + % ============================================================ 110 110 + 111 111 + \section{Everyone Is a Programmer Now} 112 112 + 113 113 + Large language models have changed the economics of programming. A student who can describe what they want in natural language can produce working code. The barrier to computational creation has collapsed from ``years of technical training'' to ``the ability to articulate an idea.'' 114 114 + 115 115 + This is the most important shift in computing since the personal computer. And it makes the Chromebook problem \emph{catastrophically worse}. 116 116 + 117 117 + \subsection{The New Literacy} 118 118 + 119 119 + If everyone can program, then programming is literacy. And literacy requires tools the literate person can own. You do not teach a child to read by giving them a locked book that can only be opened in a specific building with a specific corporate account. You give them the book. They take it home. They read it in bed. They write in the margins. They lend it to a friend. 120 120 + 121 121 + A student with an LLM and an open operating system can: 122 122 + 123 123 + \begin{itemize} 124 124 + \item Build a tool to organize their homework 125 125 + \item Write a game and share it with classmates 126 126 + \item Automate a repetitive task their teacher assigns 127 127 + \item Create a small business selling software to their community 128 128 + \item Contribute to open-source projects that serve humanity 129 129 + \item Understand and modify the systems that govern their digital life 130 130 + \item Explore logic, mathematics, and language through direct manipulation 131 131 + \item Build instruments for artistic expression 132 132 + \end{itemize} 133 133 + 134 134 + A student with an LLM and a Chromebook can use Google Docs faster. 135 135 + 136 136 + \subsection{The Spiritual Dimension} 137 137 + 138 138 + This is not only about economics or career preparation. There is a spiritual dimension to computing that the Chromebook architecture annihilates. 139 139 + 140 140 + When a student writes a program that does something they did not expect---when the machine surprises them with emergent behavior from rules they defined---they experience something profound. They encounter the boundary between intention and consequence. They learn that systems have their own logic. They develop a relationship with abstraction itself. 141 141 + 142 142 + Papert understood this~\citep{papert1980mindstorms}: Logo was not about teaching programming. It was about giving children a medium for thinking about thinking. The turtle was a vehicle for epistemology. 143 143 + 144 144 + LLMs amplify this a thousandfold. A student can now have a \emph{conversation} with the computational medium. They can ask ``what if?'' and get an answer in seconds. They can iterate on ideas at the speed of thought. They can explore paths that no curriculum anticipated. 145 145 + 146 146 + But only if the machine lets them. A Chromebook does not let them. A Chromebook says: you may consume services. You may not create infrastructure. You may not run your own code in your own way on your own machine. 147 147 + 148 148 + % ============================================================ 149 149 + % 3. WHAT STUDENTS DESERVE 150 150 + % ============================================================ 151 151 + 152 152 + \section{What Every Student Deserves} 153 153 + 154 154 + Every student deserves a computer that: 155 155 + 156 156 + \begin{enumerate} 157 157 + \item \textbf{They can understand.} The source code of the operating system should be available for inspection. Not as an abstract principle, but as a practical reality: the student should be able to read the code that runs when they press a key. 158 158 + 159 159 + \item \textbf{They can modify.} If the student wants to change how the machine behaves, they should be able to. Not through an app store, not through a settings panel, but by changing the code. 160 160 + 161 161 + \item \textbf{They can own.} The student's work should live on the student's machine. Not on a corporate server, not in a cloud account that will be decommissioned when they graduate. 162 162 + 163 163 + \item \textbf{They can share.} The student should be able to give their software to a friend. Not through a platform, not through a marketplace, but by copying a file. 164 164 + 165 165 + \item \textbf{They can break.} The student should be able to break the machine and fix it. This is how you learn. A system that cannot be broken cannot be understood. 166 166 + 167 167 + \item \textbf{They can take with them.} When the student leaves the school, the computer---and everything on it---goes with them. Their computational life is not leased. It is theirs. 168 168 + 169 169 + \item \textbf{Respects their attention.} The operating system should not contain advertising, behavioral tracking, or engagement optimization. The student's attention belongs to the student. 170 170 + 171 171 + \item \textbf{Connects them to community.} The student should be able to contribute to the computational landscape---to write code that others use, to participate in open-source projects, to build tools that serve their community and maintain their lifestyle and wellbeing. 172 172 + \end{enumerate} 173 173 + 174 174 + Every one of these requirements is violated by ChromeOS. Every one of them is satisfied by a free and open operating system. 175 175 + 176 176 + % ============================================================ 177 177 + % 4. THE OPEN STACK 178 178 + % ============================================================ 179 179 + 180 180 + \section{The Open Stack} 181 181 + 182 182 + The technology exists. It has existed for decades. The Linux kernel is free. GCC is free. Python is free. Firefox is free. LibreOffice is free. The entire GNU/Linux ecosystem---from bootloader to browser---is available at zero cost, with full source code, modifiable by anyone. 183 183 + 184 184 + What is missing is not technology. What is missing is \emph{will}. 185 185 + 186 186 + \subsection{The IT Excuse} 187 187 + 188 188 + School IT departments choose Chromebooks because they are ``easy to manage.'' This is true. It is easy to manage a machine that does nothing. It is easy to administer a fleet when every device is a thin client for a single corporation's services. The ease of management is a direct consequence of the machine's powerlessness. 189 189 + 190 190 + The question is: easy for whom? Easy for the IT department, certainly. But catastrophic for the student. The IT department's convenience is purchased with the student's autonomy. This is a bad trade. 191 191 + 192 192 + Open-source management tools exist. NixOS provides reproducible system configurations. Ansible automates fleet deployment. PXE boot enables zero-touch provisioning. \acos{}~\citep{scudder2026acos} demonstrates that an entire OS can be deployed by flashing a USB drive in under a minute, with OTA updates requiring zero IT infrastructure. The ``management problem'' is solved. What remains is institutional inertia and a contractual relationship with Google that serves the institution, not the student. 193 193 + 194 194 + \subsection{The Cost Excuse} 195 195 + 196 196 + Chromebooks are cheap. But so are surplus laptops running Linux. A retired ThinkPad costs \$50--80 and is a superior machine in every dimension except ``managed by Google.'' The cost argument for Chromebooks is an argument for Google's ecosystem, not for the hardware. 197 197 + 198 198 + \begin{table}[H] 199 199 + \small 200 200 + \centering 201 201 + \begin{tabular}{lrr} 202 202 + \toprule 203 203 + \textbf{Approach} & \textbf{Cost} & \textbf{Student Owns It} \\ 204 204 + \midrule 205 205 + Chromebook (new) & \$200--300 & No \\ 206 206 + Chromebook (managed) & +\$30/yr & No \\ 207 207 + iPad (edu) & \$299+ & No \\ 208 208 + Surplus laptop + Linux & \$50--80 & \textbf{Yes} \\ 209 209 + Surplus laptop + AC OS & \$50--80 & \textbf{Yes} \\ 210 210 + \bottomrule 211 211 + \end{tabular} 212 212 + \caption{Cost and ownership comparison.} 213 213 + \label{tab:cost} 214 214 + \end{table} 215 215 + 216 216 + The cheapest option is also the only option where the student owns the machine. This is not a coincidence. Ownership is cheap. Renting is expensive. The Chromebook model is a rental agreement disguised as a purchase. 217 217 + 218 218 + \subsection{Every Chromebook Is Already a Linux Machine} 219 219 + 220 220 + Here is the absurdity: every Chromebook already runs the Linux kernel. ChromeOS is Linux with a locked-down userspace that forces all interaction through Google's browser. The hardware is perfectly capable of running a free operating system. Google took a free kernel, wrapped it in proprietary restrictions, and sold it to schools as a cost-saving measure. 221 221 + 222 222 + The liberation of these machines does not require new hardware. It requires flashing new software. Many Chromebooks can be unlocked and reflashed with a standard Linux distribution or with \acos{}. The machine \emph{already wants to be free}. Google is the lock. 223 223 + 224 224 + % ============================================================ 225 225 + % 5. THE LLM GATEWAY 226 226 + % ============================================================ 227 227 + 228 228 + \section{The LLM Gateway} 229 229 + 230 230 + An open computer with an LLM is a fundamentally different educational instrument than a Chromebook with Google Docs. 231 231 + 232 232 + \subsection{The Student as Author} 233 233 + 234 234 + On an open system, the student can run a local LLM or connect to an API. They can: 235 235 + 236 236 + \begin{itemize} 237 237 + \item Ask the LLM to explain the operating system's source code 238 238 + \item Generate programs that run locally, with full hardware access 239 239 + \item Build web servers, databases, APIs---real infrastructure 240 240 + \item Create tools that solve real problems in their community 241 241 + \item Learn any programming language by building in it 242 242 + \item Understand the LLM itself by examining its inputs and outputs 243 243 + \end{itemize} 244 244 + 245 245 + The LLM becomes a tutor with infinite patience, available 24 hours a day, that meets the student exactly where they are. But this tutor can only be effective if the student has a machine that can \emph{execute} what the tutor produces. A Chromebook cannot execute a Python script. A Chromebook cannot run a local server. A Chromebook cannot compile C. The LLM produces code and the Chromebook says: no. 246 246 + 247 247 + \subsection{Contributing to the Computational Landscape} 248 248 + 249 249 + An open operating system means the student can \emph{contribute}. They can write a program and publish it. They can fix a bug in an open-source project. They can build a tool that their school uses. They can create a piece on \ac{}~\citep{scudder2026ac} that anyone in the world can run. 250 250 + 251 251 + This is not a hypothetical future. This is what happens when you give a young person a real computer and a language model. They build things. They share things. They discover that computation is not consumption---it is \emph{participation}. 252 252 + 253 253 + The Chromebook model says: you are a user. The open model says: you are an author. In the age of LLMs, the difference between these two framings is the difference between digital literacy and digital serfdom. 254 254 + 255 255 + % ============================================================ 256 256 + % 6. AGAINST SURVEILLANCE 257 257 + % ============================================================ 258 258 + 259 259 + \section{Against Surveillance in Schools} 260 260 + 261 261 + Google provides Chromebooks to schools below cost because students are a captive market for behavioral data~\citep{zuboff2019surveillance, doctorow2020attack}. A student who grows up in the Google ecosystem---Gmail, Google Docs, Google Drive, Google Classroom, YouTube---is a customer for life. The Chromebook is not a charitable donation. It is a customer acquisition strategy deployed against children. 262 262 + 263 263 + The data collected includes: 264 264 + 265 265 + \begin{itemize} 266 266 + \item Every search query 267 267 + \item Every document opened and edited 268 268 + \item Every website visited 269 269 + \item Every YouTube video watched 270 270 + \item Keystroke timing patterns 271 271 + \item Login and usage patterns 272 272 + \item Location data (on cellular models) 273 273 + \item Social graphs (who collaborates with whom) 274 274 + \end{itemize} 275 275 + 276 276 + This data is collected from minors, in an institutional setting where participation is mandatory, on machines the student did not choose and cannot configure. The student cannot opt out. The parent often cannot opt out. The school district signed a contract, and the children are bound by it. 277 277 + 278 278 + Winner argued that artifacts have politics~\citep{winner1980artifacts}. The Chromebook's politics are clear: it is an instrument of surveillance deployed in a context where the surveilled have no choice, no recourse, and no understanding of what is being taken from them. 279 279 + 280 280 + A free and open operating system collects no telemetry. It phones home to no corporation. It builds no behavioral profile. The student's attention, their curiosity, their mistakes, their explorations---all of these remain private, because the machine has no economic incentive to observe them. 281 281 + 282 282 + % ============================================================ 283 283 + % 7. IMPLEMENTATION 284 284 + % ============================================================ 285 285 + 286 286 + \section{A Path Forward} 287 287 + 288 288 + \subsection{Phase 1: Awareness} 289 289 + 290 290 + Parents, teachers, and school board members must understand what a Chromebook actually is: a surveillance device that teaches learned helplessness. The first step is education---not of the children, but of the adults who purchase the machines. 291 291 + 292 292 + \subsection{Phase 2: Pilot Programs} 293 293 + 294 294 + School districts should pilot open-source alternatives. This means: 295 295 + 296 296 + \begin{itemize} 297 297 + \item A classroom of 30 surplus laptops running Linux or \acos{}, provisioned for \$1,500--2,400 in hardware 298 298 + \item An LLM-assisted curriculum where students build real software 299 299 + \item Student ownership: the machine goes home with the student 300 300 + \item No cloud dependency: work is stored locally and backed up by the student 301 301 + \item Open assessment: the student's portfolio is code they wrote, tools they built, contributions they made 302 302 + \end{itemize} 303 303 + 304 304 + \subsection{Phase 3: Policy} 305 305 + 306 306 + States and districts should adopt policies requiring that: 307 307 + 308 308 + \begin{enumerate} 309 309 + \item All software deployed on student devices be open-source or source-available 310 310 + \item Students have root access to their own machines 311 311 + \item No behavioral telemetry is collected from student devices 312 312 + \item Students retain ownership of all work produced on school devices 313 313 + \item Graduating students keep their devices 314 314 + \end{enumerate} 315 315 + 316 316 + These are not radical demands. They are the minimum conditions for digital literacy in an age when every person is a potential programmer. 317 317 + 318 318 + \subsection{Phase 4: Liberation} 319 319 + 320 320 + The endgame is not a policy change. It is a cultural shift. The endgame is a generation of students who understand that a computer is not a product they consume but an instrument they play---a medium for thought, creation, and contribution. Students who can read source code the way they read books. Students who can modify their tools the way a carpenter modifies a workbench. Students who see computation not as a corporate service but as a public commons to which they both contribute and belong. 321 321 + 322 322 + Nelson wrote in 1974~\citep{nelson1974computerlib}: ``You can and must understand computers NOW.'' Fifty years later, we have failed this imperative in precisely the way Nelson feared---by handing the machines to corporations and calling it progress. 323 323 + 324 324 + The LLM moment makes this failure visible. Every student now has the \emph{capability} to program. What they lack is a \emph{machine that lets them}. This is a solvable problem. The technology is free. The hardware is surplus. The only thing standing between every student and their own computational path is a corporate operating system that was never designed to serve them. 325 325 + 326 326 + % ============================================================ 327 327 + % 8. CONCLUSION 328 328 + % ============================================================ 329 329 + 330 330 + \section{Conclusion} 331 331 + 332 332 + Every Chromebook in every American school is a Linux machine in chains. The hardware can run a free operating system. The student can learn to program with an LLM. The surplus laptop market provides machines for \$50. The entire open-source stack is available at zero cost. 333 333 + 334 334 + What we lack is not technology. We lack the political will to prioritize student autonomy over institutional convenience and corporate profit. 335 335 + 336 336 + Illich wrote that tools should expand personal autonomy rather than require specialized expertise~\citep{illich1973tools}. Papert wrote that computers should be instruments for thinking about thinking~\citep{papert1980mindstorms}. Stallman wrote that users deserve to control the software they run~\citep{stallman2002free}. These are not fringe positions. They are the founding principles of personal computing, and we have abandoned them in the one place they matter most: the education of children. 337 337 + 338 338 + Get closed source out of schools. Give every student a free and open operating system. Let the Chromebook be what it was always capable of being: not a gate, but a \emph{gateway}---to logic, creativity, community, spirituality, and every student's own path through the computational landscape. 339 339 + 340 340 + In the age of LLMs, this is not idealism. It is the minimum viable education. 341 341 + 342 342 + \vspace{0.5em} 343 343 + \noindent\textbf{ORCID:} \href{https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4460-4913}{0009-0007-4460-4913} 344 344 + 345 345 + \end{multicols} 346 346 + 347 347 + % ============================================================ 348 348 + % REFERENCES 349 349 + % ============================================================ 350 350 + 351 351 + \bibliographystyle{plainnat} 352 352 + \bibliography{references} 353 353 + 354 354 + \end{document}

+180

papers/arxiv-open-schools/references.bib

reviewed

··· 1 1 + @book{stallman2002free, 2 2 + title={Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman}, 3 3 + author={Stallman, Richard M.}, 4 4 + year={2002}, 5 5 + publisher={GNU Press}, 6 6 + address={Boston, MA} 7 7 + } 8 8 + 9 9 + @book{illich1971deschooling, 10 10 + title={Deschooling Society}, 11 11 + author={Illich, Ivan}, 12 12 + year={1971}, 13 13 + publisher={Harper \& Row}, 14 14 + address={New York} 15 15 + } 16 16 + 17 17 + @book{illich1973tools, 18 18 + title={Tools for Conviviality}, 19 19 + author={Illich, Ivan}, 20 20 + year={1973}, 21 21 + publisher={Harper \& Row}, 22 22 + address={New York} 23 23 + } 24 24 + 25 25 + @book{papert1980mindstorms, 26 26 + title={Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas}, 27 27 + author={Papert, Seymour}, 28 28 + year={1980}, 29 29 + publisher={Basic Books}, 30 30 + address={New York} 31 31 + } 32 32 + 33 33 + @book{nelson1974computerlib, 34 34 + title={Computer Lib / Dream Machines}, 35 35 + author={Nelson, Theodor H.}, 36 36 + year={1974}, 37 37 + publisher={Self-published}, 38 38 + note={Revised edition, Microsoft Press, 1987} 39 39 + } 40 40 + 41 41 + @book{mcluhan1964understanding, 42 42 + title={Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man}, 43 43 + author={McLuhan, Marshall}, 44 44 + year={1964}, 45 45 + publisher={McGraw-Hill}, 46 46 + address={New York} 47 47 + } 48 48 + 49 49 + @article{kittler1995no, 50 50 + title={There is No Software}, 51 51 + author={Kittler, Friedrich A.}, 52 52 + year={1995}, 53 53 + journal={CTheory}, 54 54 + note={Article a032} 55 55 + } 56 56 + 57 57 + @misc{scudder2026ac, 58 58 + title={Aesthetic Computer '26: A Mobile-First Runtime for Creative Computing}, 59 59 + author={{@jeffrey}}, 60 60 + year={2026}, 61 61 + note={Companion paper describing the AC platform} 62 62 + } 63 63 + 64 64 + @misc{scudder2026acos, 65 65 + title={AC Native OS '26: A Bare-Metal Creative Computing Operating System}, 66 66 + author={{@jeffrey}}, 67 67 + year={2026}, 68 68 + note={Companion paper describing the AC Native OS} 69 69 + } 70 70 + 71 71 + @book{zuboff2019surveillance, 72 72 + title={The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power}, 73 73 + author={Zuboff, Shoshana}, 74 74 + year={2019}, 75 75 + publisher={PublicAffairs}, 76 76 + address={New York} 77 77 + } 78 78 + 79 79 + @article{resnick2009scratch, 80 80 + title={Scratch: Programming for All}, 81 81 + author={Resnick, Mitchel and Maloney, John and Monroy-Hern{\'a}ndez, Andr{\'e}s and Rusk, Natalie and Eastmond, Evelyn and Brennan, Karen and Millner, Amon and Rosenbaum, Eric and Silver, Jay and Silverman, Brian and Kafai, Yasmin}, 82 82 + journal={Communications of the ACM}, 83 83 + volume={52}, 84 84 + number={11}, 85 85 + pages={60--67}, 86 86 + year={2009}, 87 87 + publisher={ACM} 88 88 + } 89 89 + 90 90 + @book{reas2007processing, 91 91 + title={Processing: A Programming Handbook for Visual Designers and Artists}, 92 92 + author={Reas, Casey and Fry, Ben}, 93 93 + year={2007}, 94 94 + publisher={MIT Press}, 95 95 + address={Cambridge, MA} 96 96 + } 97 97 + 98 98 + @book{freire1970pedagogy, 99 99 + title={Pedagogy of the Oppressed}, 100 100 + author={Freire, Paulo}, 101 101 + year={1970}, 102 102 + publisher={Herder and Herder}, 103 103 + address={New York} 104 104 + } 105 105 + 106 106 + @book{postman1995end, 107 107 + title={The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School}, 108 108 + author={Postman, Neil}, 109 109 + year={1995}, 110 110 + publisher={Alfred A. Knopf}, 111 111 + address={New York} 112 112 + } 113 113 + 114 114 + @inproceedings{kraemer2009olpc, 115 115 + title={One Laptop per Child: Vision vs. Reality}, 116 116 + author={Kraemer, Kenneth L. and Dedrick, Jason and Sharma, Prakul}, 117 117 + booktitle={Communications of the ACM}, 118 118 + volume={52}, 119 119 + number={6}, 120 120 + pages={66--73}, 121 121 + year={2009}, 122 122 + publisher={ACM} 123 123 + } 124 124 + 125 125 + @misc{google2024chromeos, 126 126 + title={ChromeOS}, 127 127 + author={{Google LLC}}, 128 128 + year={2024}, 129 129 + url={https://chromeos.google}, 130 130 + note={Cloud-first operating system for Chromebook hardware} 131 131 + } 132 132 + 133 133 + @book{doctorow2020attack, 134 134 + title={How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism}, 135 135 + author={Doctorow, Cory}, 136 136 + year={2020}, 137 137 + publisher={OneZero/Medium} 138 138 + } 139 139 + 140 140 + @article{feenberg1999questioning, 141 141 + title={Questioning Technology}, 142 142 + author={Feenberg, Andrew}, 143 143 + year={1999}, 144 144 + publisher={Routledge}, 145 145 + address={London} 146 146 + } 147 147 + 148 148 + @misc{fsf2024badminating, 149 149 + title={Proprietary Software Is Often Malware}, 150 150 + author={{Free Software Foundation}}, 151 151 + year={2024}, 152 152 + url={https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/}, 153 153 + note={Catalog of proprietary software abuses} 154 154 + } 155 155 + 156 156 + @article{warschauer2004technology, 157 157 + title={Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide}, 158 158 + author={Warschauer, Mark}, 159 159 + year={2004}, 160 160 + publisher={MIT Press}, 161 161 + address={Cambridge, MA} 162 162 + } 163 163 + 164 164 + @book{winner1986whale, 165 165 + title={The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology}, 166 166 + author={Winner, Langdon}, 167 167 + year={1986}, 168 168 + publisher={University of Chicago Press}, 169 169 + address={Chicago} 170 170 + } 171 171 + 172 172 + @incollection{winner1980artifacts, 173 173 + title={Do Artifacts Have Politics?}, 174 174 + author={Winner, Langdon}, 175 175 + booktitle={Daedalus}, 176 176 + volume={109}, 177 177 + number={1}, 178 178 + pages={121--136}, 179 179 + year={1980} 180 180 + }