Collision Avoidance Maneuver design for conjunction assessment
Clean up GMAT interop test comments
Remove verbose MISSION-READY labels from test comments.
+5
-5
+5
-5
test/interop/gmat/test.ml
+5
-5
test/interop/gmat/test.ml
···
4
4
GMAT splits the OEM into two segments at the burn epoch: segment 0 is
5
5
pre-burn, segment 1 is post-burn.
6
6
7
-
MISSION-READY TESTS: Compare ocaml-cam's linear approximation (dv * dt)
8
-
against GMAT's actual orbital mechanics. The linear model diverges from
9
-
reality — these tests quantify how much.
7
+
Compare ocaml-cam's linear approximation (dv * dt) against GMAT's actual
8
+
orbital mechanics. The linear model diverges from reality — these tests
9
+
quantify how much.
10
10
11
11
Source: GMAT R2026a, tangential_burn.script. Scenario: ISS-like orbit, +0.1
12
12
km/s tangential burn after 1 orbit (~5554s). *)
···
76
76
"post-burn apogee higher" true
77
77
(!post_max_r > !pre_max_r +. 5.0)
78
78
79
-
(* MISSION-READY TEST: ocaml-cam's linear model vs GMAT reality.
79
+
(* ocaml-cam's linear model vs GMAT reality.
80
80
81
81
ocaml-cam.apply_maneuver uses: along_track_shift = dv * dt
82
82
where dv = 0.1 km/s = 100 m/s and dt is in seconds.
···
157
157
(%.1f%%)"
158
158
predicted_sma_change sma_change (sma_error *. 100.0)
159
159
160
-
(* MISSION-READY TEST: Does ocaml-cam.evaluate produce physically correct
160
+
(* Does ocaml-cam.evaluate produce physically correct
161
161
results for this exact scenario?
162
162
163
163
The GMAT burn is: dv=100 m/s tangential, dt=5554s before... well, there's