oppi.li / perf-test
loading up the forgejo repo on tangled to test page performance
0
fork

Configure Feed

Select the types of activity you want to include in your feed.

Minor grammatical fix to runner deletion message (#7479)

WIP until someone else tells me whether the whole message should be changed or whether `s/mark/marked/` is enough.
I am honestly not sure what "It may break building workflow." means in this context either but it doesn't sound correct to me.

## Checklist
*snipped* - this is really minor, please let me know if there's a better checklist to use for changes like this

### Release notes

- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. [Change is too minor]

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7479
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: voltagex <git@voltagex.org>
Co-committed-by: voltagex <git@voltagex.org>

authored by

voltagex
voltagex and committed by
Earl Warren cb4ef449 d46cf46f

+1 -1
+1 -1
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
··· 3871 3871 runners.delete_runner_success = Runner deleted successfully 3872 3872 runners.delete_runner_failed = Failed to delete runner 3873 3873 runners.delete_runner_header = Confirm to delete this runner 3874 - runners.delete_runner_notice = If a task is running on this runner, it will be terminated and mark as failed. It may break building workflow. 3874 + runners.delete_runner_notice = If a task is running on this runner, it will be terminated and marked as failed. It may break building workflow. 3875 3875 runners.none = No runners available 3876 3876 runners.status.unspecified = Unknown 3877 3877 runners.status.idle = Idle